↓ Skip to main content

Characterisation of sunflower root colonisation by Phoma macdonaldii

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Plant Pathology, November 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Characterisation of sunflower root colonisation by Phoma macdonaldii
Published in
European Journal of Plant Pathology, November 2008
DOI 10.1007/s10658-008-9396-9
Authors

Taissir Abou Al Fadil, Alain Jauneau, Yves Martinez, Martina Rickauer, Grégory Dechamp-Guillaume

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 38%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 23%
Student > Master 2 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Unknown 2 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 69%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%
Environmental Science 1 8%
Unknown 2 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2016.
All research outputs
#7,495,032
of 22,912,409 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Plant Pathology
#317
of 943 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,030
of 166,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Plant Pathology
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,912,409 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 943 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,506 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.