↓ Skip to main content

Kericodon (Campanulaceae s.s.), a new monotypic wahlenbergioid genus from South Africa

Overview of attention for article published in Kew Bulletin, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
Title
Kericodon (Campanulaceae s.s.), a new monotypic wahlenbergioid genus from South Africa
Published in
Kew Bulletin, December 2016
DOI 10.1007/s12225-016-9671-4
Authors

Christopher N. Cupido, Frans M. Weitz

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2016.
All research outputs
#6,297,587
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Kew Bulletin
#197
of 1,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,209
of 420,311 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Kew Bulletin
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,185 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,311 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them