You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Diverse Mechanisms of Somatic Structural Variations in Human Cancer Genomes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cell, May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.cell.2013.04.010 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lixing Yang, Lovelace J. Luquette, Nils Gehlenborg, Ruibin Xi, Psalm S. Haseley, Chih-Heng Hsieh, Chengsheng Zhang, Xiaojia Ren, Alexei Protopopov, Lynda Chin, Raju Kucherlapati, Charles Lee, Peter J. Park |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 41% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 18% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 6% |
| Costa Rica | 1 | 6% |
| Germany | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 4 | 24% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 10 | 59% |
| Members of the public | 5 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 522 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 15 | 3% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Portugal | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| China | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 2% |
| Unknown | 484 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 131 | 25% |
| Researcher | 119 | 23% |
| Student > Bachelor | 41 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 38 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 31 | 6% |
| Other | 100 | 19% |
| Unknown | 62 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 190 | 36% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 133 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 55 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 40 | 8% |
| Engineering | 11 | 2% |
| Other | 28 | 5% |
| Unknown | 65 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2020.
All research outputs
#1,462,744
of 25,706,302 outputs
Outputs from Cell
#4,729
of 17,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,367
of 205,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell
#48
of 127 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,706,302 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,262 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 59.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,154 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 127 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.