You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A new valuation school: Integrating diverse values of nature in resource and land use decisions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecosystem Services, December 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.11.007 |
| Authors |
Sander Jacobs, Nicolas Dendoncker, Berta Martín-López, David Nicholas Barton, Erik Gomez-Baggethun, Fanny Boeraeve, Francesca L. McGrath, Kati Vierikko, Davide Geneletti, Katharina J. Sevecke, Nathalie Pipart, Eeva Primmer, Peter Mederly, Stefan Schmidt, Alexandra Aragão, Himlal Baral, Rosalind H. Bark, Tania Briceno, Delphine Brogna, Pedro Cabral, Rik De Vreese, Camino Liquete, Hannah Mueller, Kelvin S.-H. Peh, Anna Phelan, Alexander R. Rincón, Shannon H. Rogers, Francis Turkelboom, Wouter Van Reeth, Boris T. van Zanten, Hilde Karine Wam, Carla-Leanne Washbourn |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 2 | 12% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| Senegal | 1 | 6% |
| Italy | 1 | 6% |
| Norway | 1 | 6% |
| Nepal | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 65% |
| Scientists | 6 | 35% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 911 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 900 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 164 | 18% |
| Researcher | 152 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 130 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 64 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 53 | 6% |
| Other | 157 | 17% |
| Unknown | 191 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 286 | 31% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 101 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 79 | 9% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 53 | 6% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 25 | 3% |
| Other | 105 | 12% |
| Unknown | 262 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2021.
All research outputs
#1,294,915
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Ecosystem Services
#70
of 1,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,416
of 420,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecosystem Services
#3
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,079 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,468 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.