↓ Skip to main content

Anti-NMDA-Receptor Encephalitis: Case Report and Literature Review of an Under-Recognized Condition

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of General Internal Medicine, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
79 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Anti-NMDA-Receptor Encephalitis: Case Report and Literature Review of an Under-Recognized Condition
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine, February 2011
DOI 10.1007/s11606-011-1641-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gregory S. Day, Sasha M. High, Bianca Cot, David F. Tang-Wai

Abstract

Anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (anti-NMDA-R) encephalitis is an immune-mediated syndrome that remains under-recognized despite a growing body of literature. This syndrome has been predominantly described in young females with a constellation of symptoms, including personality changes, autonomic dysfunction and neurologic decompensation. It is commonly associated with mature ovarian teratomas. We describe the classic presentation of anti-NMDA-R encephalitis in three dramatically different patients: Case A, a young woman with ovarian teratoma; Case B, the eldest case reported to date; and Case C, a young male with no identifiable tumor. We review the literature summarizing the differential diagnosis, investigative approach, treatment options and challenges inherent to this disorder. We advocate good supportive care, involvement of multiple health disciplines and use of immune-modulating therapies in patient management. These cases underscore the need for increased awareness and high diagnostic suspicion when approaching the patient with suspected viral encephalitis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
Colombia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 113 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 16 13%
Student > Bachelor 14 12%
Researcher 13 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 10%
Student > Postgraduate 11 9%
Other 33 28%
Unknown 20 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 64 54%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 7%
Neuroscience 6 5%
Psychology 6 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 25 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2014.
All research outputs
#14,759,948
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#5,426
of 7,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,808
of 190,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#33
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,658 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.