| Title |
An Automatic Correction Method for the Heel Effect in Digitized Mammography Images
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Digital Imaging, September 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10278-007-9072-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marcelo Zanchetta do Nascimento, Annie France Frère, Fernao Germano |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 47 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 13% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 12 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 16 | 33% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 13% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 5 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 13 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2017.
All research outputs
#7,495,032
of 22,912,409 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Digital Imaging
#339
of 1,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,956
of 70,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Digital Imaging
#7
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,912,409 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,055 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 70,164 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.