↓ Skip to main content

Role of Mixed Reflux and Hypomotility with Delayed Reflux Clearance in Patients with Non-cardiac Chest Pain

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Role of Mixed Reflux and Hypomotility with Delayed Reflux Clearance in Patients with Non-cardiac Chest Pain
Published in
Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, October 2016
DOI 10.5056/jnm15182
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mentore Ribolsi, Paola Balestrieri, Dario Biasutto, Sara Emerenziani, Michele Cicala

Abstract

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is the most common cause of non-cardiac chest pain (NCCP). Currently available data reveal a weak relationship between NCCP and dismotility. Moreover, it is unclear why some refluxes are perceived as heartburn and others as NCCP. We aimed to evaluate the role of the reflux pattern and of the esophageal motility in the pathogenesis and perception of NCCP in non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) patients. Forty-eight NERD patients with NCCP as main symptom (Group 1) and 50, presenting only typical symptoms (Group 2), underwent high-resolution manometry (HRM) and multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring. Weak peristalsis was found in 60% of patients with NCCP and in 24% of patients with typical symptoms (P < 0.05). In patients belonging to Group 1, the majority of reflux episodes associated with chest pain were acid and mixed. Both in Group 1 and Group 2 the proportion of mixed refluxes associated with NCCP was higher than the proportion of mixed refluxes associated with typical symptoms. In patients belonging to Group 1, the reflux clearing time at 5, 9, and 15 cm, measured in reflux episodes associated to NCCP was higher than in reflux episodes associated to typical symptoms (mean ± 95% CI: 27.2 ± 5.6, 23.3 ± 4.4, and 14.6 ± 2.3 seconds vs 18.3 ± 3.5, 13.3 ± 2.2, and 11.1 ± 1.8 seconds; P < 0.01). The presence of gas in the refluxate seems to be associated with NCCP perception. The impaired motility observed in NCCP patients may play a relevant role in delaying reflux clearing, hence increasing the time of contact between refluxate and esophageal mucosa.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 22%
Professor 1 11%
Student > Postgraduate 1 11%
Researcher 1 11%
Unknown 4 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 33%
Arts and Humanities 1 11%
Psychology 1 11%
Engineering 1 11%
Unknown 3 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2016.
All research outputs
#20,660,571
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility
#361
of 963 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#257,475
of 332,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility
#10
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 963 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,582 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.