Title |
Evaluating camera traps as an alternative to live trapping for estimating the density of snowshoe hares (Lepus americanus) and red squirrels (Tamiasciurus hudsonicus)
|
---|---|
Published in |
European Journal of Wildlife Research, December 2016
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10344-016-1064-3 |
Authors |
Petra Villette, Charles J. Krebs, Thomas S. Jung |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 2 | 29% |
Djibouti | 1 | 14% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 96 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 27 | 28% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 13 | 14% |
Researcher | 11 | 11% |
Other | 6 | 6% |
Other | 8 | 8% |
Unknown | 14 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 47 | 49% |
Environmental Science | 25 | 26% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 3% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 1% |
Other | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 16 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2017.
All research outputs
#7,808,588
of 25,632,496 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Wildlife Research
#366
of 1,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,926
of 421,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Wildlife Research
#9
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,632,496 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,092 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,739 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.