Title |
Coffee and oxidative stress: a human intervention study
|
---|---|
Published in |
European Journal of Nutrition, November 2016
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00394-016-1336-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sergey Shaposhnikov, Thomas Hatzold, Naouale El Yamani, Philip Mark Stavro, Yolanda Lorenzo, Maria Dusinska, Astrid Reus, Wilrike Pasman, Andrew Collins |
Abstract |
Coffee is known to contain phytochemicals with antioxidant potential. The aim of this study was to investigate possible antioxidant effects of coffee in healthy human volunteers. A placebo-controlled intervention trial was carried out on 160 healthy human subjects, randomised into three groups, receiving 3 or 5 cups of study coffee or water per day, for 8 weeks. Blood samples were taken before, during, and after the intervention. Serum was used for analysis of blood lipids and standard clinical chemistry analytes. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated, and DNA damage (strand breaks and oxidised bases) was measured with the comet assay. The lipid oxidation product isoprostane 8-iso-PGF2α was assayed in urine samples by LC-MS/MS. There was no significant effect of coffee consumption on the markers of oxidation of DNA and lipids. Creatinine (in serum) increased by a few per cent in all groups, and the liver enzyme γ-glutamyl transaminase was significantly elevated in serum in the 5 cups/day group. Other clinical markers (including glucose and insulin), cholesterol, triacylglycerides, and inflammatory markers were unchanged. There was no effect of coffee on blood pressure. In a carefully controlled clinical trial with healthy subjects, up to 5 cups of coffee per day had no detectable effect, either beneficial or harmful, on human health. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 5 | 18% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 11% |
South Africa | 2 | 7% |
Iraq | 1 | 4% |
Cameroon | 1 | 4% |
Australia | 1 | 4% |
Saudi Arabia | 1 | 4% |
Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 13 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 22 | 79% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 14% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Scientists | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 117 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 19 | 16% |
Student > Master | 16 | 14% |
Researcher | 15 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 4% |
Other | 13 | 11% |
Unknown | 40 | 34% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 21% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 12% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 7% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 4% |
Other | 10 | 9% |
Unknown | 48 | 41% |