↓ Skip to main content

Early information processing contributions to object individuation revealed by perception of illusory figures

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurophysiology, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Early information processing contributions to object individuation revealed by perception of illusory figures
Published in
Journal of Neurophysiology, September 2016
DOI 10.1152/jn.00082.2016
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claire K Naughtin, Jason B Mattingley, Paul E Dux

Abstract

To isolate multiple coherent objects from their surrounds, each object must be represented as a stable perceptual entity across both time and space. Recent theoretical and empirical work has proposed that this process of object individuation is a mid-level operation that emerges around 200-300 ms post-stimulus onset. However, this hypothesis is based on paradigms that have potentially obscured earlier effects. Further, no study to date has directly assessed whether object individuation occurs for task-irrelevant objects. Here we used electroencephalography (EEG) to measure the timecourse of individuation, both for stimuli within and outside the focus of attention, to assess the information processing stage at which object individuation arises for both types of objects. We developed a novel paradigm involving items defined by illusory contours, which allowed us to vary the number of to-be-individuated objects while holding the physical elements of the display constant (a design characteristic not present in earlier work). As early as 100 ms post-stimulus onset, event-related potentials tracked the number of objects in the attended hemifield, but not those in the unattended hemifield. By contrast, both attended and unattended objects could be individuated at a later stage. Our findings challenge recent conceptualizations of the timecourse of object individuation, and suggest that this process arises earlier for attended than unattended items, implying that voluntary spatial attention influences the timecourse of this operation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Unknown 26 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 22%
Student > Master 5 19%
Professor 2 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 7 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 9 33%
Neuroscience 7 26%
Computer Science 1 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 4%
Unknown 9 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2017.
All research outputs
#16,722,913
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurophysiology
#4,997
of 8,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#216,493
of 345,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurophysiology
#62
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,424 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,276 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.