↓ Skip to main content

The Early Toxicology of Physostigmine

Overview of attention for article published in Toxicological Reviews, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
The Early Toxicology of Physostigmine
Published in
Toxicological Reviews, August 2012
DOI 10.2165/00139709-200625020-00004
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alex Proudfoot

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 59 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 20%
Researcher 9 15%
Student > Master 9 15%
Other 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 13 22%
Unknown 9 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 30%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 12%
Psychology 6 10%
Neuroscience 4 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Other 11 18%
Unknown 11 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2023.
All research outputs
#2,267,272
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Toxicological Reviews
#11
of 85 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,698
of 186,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Toxicological Reviews
#10
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 85 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,640 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.