↓ Skip to main content

What is the Incidence of Suicide in Patients with Bone and Soft Tissue Cancer?

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
Title
What is the Incidence of Suicide in Patients with Bone and Soft Tissue Cancer?
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, November 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11999-016-5171-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brianna L. Siracuse, George Gorgy, Jeremy Ruskin, Kathleen S. Beebe

Abstract

Patients with cancer in the United States are estimated to have a suicide incidence that is approximately twice that of the general population. Patients with bone and soft tissue cancer often have physical impairments and activity limitations develop that reduce their quality of life, which may put them at high risk for depression, anxiety, and suicidal ideation. To our knowledge, there have been no large studies determining incidence of suicide among patients with bone and soft tissue cancer; this information might allow screening of certain high-risk groups. To determine (1) the incidence of suicide in patients with bone and soft tissue cancer, (2) whether the incidence of suicide is greater in patients with bone and soft tissue cancer than it is in the general US population, and (3) any demographic and tumor characteristics associated with increased suicide incidence. A retrospective analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program was performed. A total of 23,620 patients with primary bone and soft tissue cancer were identified in this database from 1973 and 2013. Patients with a cause of death listed as "suicide and self-inflicted injury" were considered to have committed suicide and suicide incidences were determined for different demographic and tumor characteristics in this subset of patients. Patient data for age, gender, race, marital status, year of diagnosis, primary cancer site, cancer stage, course of treatment, and survival time were collected and analyzed. The incidence of suicide in patients with bone and soft tissue sarcoma was compared with the age-, gender-, and race-adjusted incidence of suicide in the general US population from 1970 to 2013 available from the National Center for Health Statistics through the SEER Program. The overall suicide incidence in this population was 32 per 100,000 person-years, which was higher than the age-, race-, and gender-adjusted US general population suicide incidence of 13 per 100,000 person-years. When compared with the incidence of suicide in matched subgroups of the general US population, a higher suicide incidence was observed in men (standardized mortality ratio [SMR], 2.49; 95% CI, 1.92-3.22; p < 0.001), patients of white race (SMR, 2.68; 95% CI, 1.94-3.56; p < 0.001), patients 21 to 30 years old (SMR, 4.40; 95% CI, 3.44-5.54; p < 0.001) and 61 to 70 years old (SMR, 3.27; 95% CI, 2.54-4.18; p < 0.001), patients with cancer of the vertebral column (SMR, 2.88; 95% CI, 2.13-3.83; p < 0.001) and pelvic bones (SMR, 2.75; 95% CI, 2.00-3.65; p < 0.001), and patients within the first 5 years of cancer diagnosis (SMR, 10.8; 95% CI, 9.19-12.61; p < 0.001). With identification of these characteristics that are associated with higher incidence of suicide, physicians should consider screening patients possessing these traits. By identifying at-risk patients, we can hope to reduce the incidence of suicide in this population by providing the treatment that these patients need. Further research must be done to determine how best to screen these patients and to identify the best interventions to reduce suicide incidence. Level III, prognostic study.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 81 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 15%
Student > Bachelor 10 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 10%
Other 7 9%
Other 19 23%
Unknown 16 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 28%
Psychology 12 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 10%
Engineering 4 5%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 21 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2019.
All research outputs
#6,487,802
of 25,593,129 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#1,720
of 7,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,019
of 418,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#27
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,593,129 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,318 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 418,389 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.