You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Active Season Microhabitat and Vegetation Selection by Giant Gartersnakes Associated with a Restored Marsh in California
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Fish & Wildlife Management, September 2016
|
| DOI | 10.3996/042016-jfwm-029 |
| Authors |
Brian J. Halstead, Patricia Valcarcel, Glenn D. Wylie, Peter S. Coates, Michael L. Casazza, Daniel K. Rosenberg |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 35% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 2 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 52% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 30% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 2 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2018.
All research outputs
#6,372,943
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Fish & Wildlife Management
#38
of 224 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,056
of 348,357 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Fish & Wildlife Management
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,357 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.