↓ Skip to main content

A Neurophysiological Study of Semantic Processing in Parkinson’s Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Neurophysiological Study of Semantic Processing in Parkinson’s Disease
Published in
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, December 2016
DOI 10.1017/s1355617716000953
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anthony J. Angwin, Nadeeka N.W. Dissanayaka, Alison Moorcroft, Katie L. McMahon, Peter A. Silburn, David A. Copland

Abstract

Cognitive-linguistic impairments in Parkinson's disease (PD) have been well documented; however, few studies have explored the neurophysiological underpinnings of semantic deficits in PD. This study investigated semantic function in PD using event-related potentials. Eighteen people with PD and 18 healthy controls performed a semantic judgement task on written word pairs that were either congruent or incongruent. The mean amplitude of the N400 for new incongruent word pairs was similar for both groups, however the onset latency was delayed in the PD group. Further analysis of the data revealed that both groups demonstrated attenuation of the N400 for repeated incongruent trials, as well as attenuation of the P600 component for repeated congruent trials. The presence of N400 congruity and N400 repetition effects in the PD group suggests that semantic processing is generally intact, but with a slower time course as evidenced by the delayed N400. Additional research will be required to determine whether N400 and P600 repetition effects are sensitive to further cognitive decline in PD. (JINS, 2016, 22, 1-12).

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 45 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 22%
Student > Bachelor 8 17%
Researcher 4 9%
Student > Master 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 14 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 7 15%
Linguistics 4 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 9%
Neuroscience 4 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 20 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2016.
All research outputs
#4,196,781
of 22,912,409 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
#360
of 1,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,921
of 415,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
#8
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,912,409 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 415,994 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.