↓ Skip to main content

American College of Cardiology

2016 Annual Report of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry

Overview of attention for article published in JACC, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
61 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
30 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
444 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
211 Mendeley
Title
2016 Annual Report of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry
Published in
JACC, December 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.11.033
Pubmed ID
Authors

Frederick L. Grover, Sreekanth Vemulapalli, John D. Carroll, Fred H. Edwards, Michael J. Mack, Vinod H. Thourani, Ralph G. Brindis, David M. Shahian, Carlos E. Ruiz, Jeffrey P. Jacobs, George Hanzel, Joseph E. Bavaria, E. Murat Tuzcu, Eric D. Peterson, Susan Fitzgerald, Matina Kourtis, Joan Michaels, Barbara Christensen, William F. Seward, Kathleen Hewitt, David R. Holmes, STS/ACC TVT Registry

Abstract

The STS/ACC Transcatheter Valve Therapy (TVT) Registry captures all procedures with Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved transcatheter valve devices performed in the United States and is mandated as a condition of reimbursement by a Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services (CMS) OBJECTIVES: This annual report focuses on patient characteristics, trends, and outcomes of transcatheter aortic and mitral valve catheter-based valve procedures in the United States. Data for all patients receiving commercially approved devices from 2012 through December 31, 2015 are entered in the TVT Registry. The 54,782 TAVR patients demonstrated decreases in expected risk of 30-day operative mortality (STS PROM) 7% to 6% and TAVR PROM (TVT PROM) 4% to 3% (both p<.0001) from 2012 to 2015. Observed in-hospital mortality decreased from 5.7% to 2.9% and one-year mortality decreased from 25.8% to 21.6. However, 30-day post procedure pacemaker insertion increased from 8.8% in 2013 to 12.0% in 2015. The 2,556 patients who underwent TMC in 2015 were similar to 2013-14 patients with hospital mortality of 2% with mitral regurgitation reduced to gradient ≤ 2 in 87% of patients (p<.0001). The 349 patients who underwent MViV and MViR procedures were high risk with, an STS PROM for MVR of 11%. The observed hospital mortality was 7.2% and 30-day post procedure was 8.5%. The TVT Registry is an innovative registry that that monitors quality, patient safety and trends for these rapidly evolving new technologies. The STS/ACC TVT Registry captures all Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved transcatheter valve devices preformed in the United States and is mandated as a condition for reimbursement by the Centers for Medicare Services. TAVR patients' expected risks of mortality and actual in-hospital mortality decreased. Transcatheter mitral clip procedures had a low mortality with reduced in mitral regurgitation to grade ≤ 2 in 87%. Mitral valve in valve or valve in ring patients were high risk for mortality, but actual hospital mortality was lower. The TVT Registry is an innovative registry that monitors quality, safety and trends of these evolving technologies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 211 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 211 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 34 16%
Other 25 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 12 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 5%
Other 46 22%
Unknown 59 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 104 49%
Engineering 11 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 <1%
Computer Science 2 <1%
Other 13 6%
Unknown 73 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 493. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2019.
All research outputs
#52,980
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#132
of 16,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,113
of 420,305 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#9
of 291 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,747 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,305 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 291 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.