| Title |
Sexuality and Suicidality: Matched-Pairs Analyses Reveal Unique Characteristics in Non-Heterosexual Suicidal Behaviors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archives of Sexual Behavior, May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10508-013-0112-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Keith M. Harris |
| Abstract |
The present findings offer new perspectives on differences between suicide-risk heterosexuals and non-heterosexuals (lesbian, gay, bisexual, and questioning: LGBQ). Results from an anonymous online survey, employing standardized scales, showed that LGBQ participants reported significantly greater suicide-risk than heterosexuals. Seventy-nine matched pairs of suicide-risk LGBQ and heterosexuals were examined by individual suicide risk factors. Results showed no significant differences on separate measures of suicidal ideation; however, LGBQ participants were more likely to report suicide attempts, disclosure of suicidal intentions, and prediction of future suicide attempts. The LGBQ group also indicated greater likelihood of going online to develop new personal relationships. Multiple regression modeling was conducted to guide outreach and support efforts, revealing unique factors predicting help-seeking denial of suicide-risk LGBQ. Implications include the importance of online support and considering sexual minorities not just as a potential high-risk group, but also as a population with unique suicide risks and behaviors. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 3% |
| Australia | 3 | 3% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 113 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 19 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 10% |
| Researcher | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 24 | 20% |
| Unknown | 26 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 38 | 32% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Unknown | 31 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2017.
All research outputs
#6,763,911
of 22,710,079 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#1,968
of 3,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,303
of 193,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#27
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,710,079 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,447 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.0. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,636 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.