↓ Skip to main content

The influence of acculturation strategies in quality of life by immigrants in Northern Chile

Overview of attention for article published in Quality of Life Research, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
Title
The influence of acculturation strategies in quality of life by immigrants in Northern Chile
Published in
Quality of Life Research, December 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11136-016-1470-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alfonso Urzúa, Rodrigo Ferrer, Valentina Canales Gaete, Dominique Núñez Aragón, Ivanna Ravanal Labraña, Bárbara Tabilo Poblete

Abstract

To establish the influence of acculturation strategies on quality of life, henceforth QoL. Using a cross-sectional design, two questionnaires were applied, the WHOQoL-BREF from the World Health Organization and Basabe's acculturation strategies. The questionnaires were applied to 853 Colombian and Peruvian immigrants living in Northern Chilean cities of Arica, Antofagasta and Santiago de Chile. In the psychological and social domains, as well as in the overall assessment of QoL, the most beneficial strategies are those where customs are maintained from the homeland, where "integration" then "separation" are the most beneficial. On the contrary, when the strategy for maintaining homeland customs is low, the QoL tends to be lower. The strategy of "marginalized" is associated with a lower QoL. Acculturation strategies mildly or moderately affect the psychological and social domains of quality of life as well as the overall assessment of QoL.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Researcher 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 13 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 11 22%
Social Sciences 7 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 16 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2016.
All research outputs
#13,495,562
of 22,912,409 outputs
Outputs from Quality of Life Research
#1,316
of 2,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210,516
of 419,352 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Quality of Life Research
#20
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,912,409 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,854 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 419,352 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.