| Title |
On bias correction in drought frequency analysis based on climate models
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Climatic Change, December 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10584-016-1862-3 |
| Authors |
Yog Aryal, Jianting Zhu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 22 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 29% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 21% |
| Unknown | 1 | 4% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 9 | 38% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 21% |
| Engineering | 4 | 17% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 2 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2019.
All research outputs
#18,490,948
of 22,912,409 outputs
Outputs from Climatic Change
#5,538
of 5,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#308,069
of 419,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climatic Change
#54
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,912,409 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,816 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 419,294 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.