You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Not-so-incidental findings: the ACMG recommendations on the reporting of incidental findings in clinical whole genome and whole exome sequencing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Trends in Biotechnology, May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.tibtech.2013.04.006 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Megan Allyse, Marsha Michie |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 33% |
| France | 1 | 17% |
| Spain | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Estonia | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 112 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 17% |
| Other | 17 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 14% |
| Professor | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 26 | 21% |
| Unknown | 13 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 33% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 32 | 26% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 17 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Philosophy | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Unknown | 18 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2021.
All research outputs
#1,130,239
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Biotechnology
#108
of 2,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,698
of 205,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Biotechnology
#4
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,856 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,424 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.