↓ Skip to main content

Monogenic diabetes in children and young adults: Challenges for researcher, clinician and patient

Overview of attention for article published in Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders, December 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
Title
Monogenic diabetes in children and young adults: Challenges for researcher, clinician and patient
Published in
Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders, December 2006
DOI 10.1007/s11154-006-9014-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Annabelle S. Slingerland

Abstract

Monogenic diabetes results from one or more mutations in a single gene which might hence be rare but has great impact leading to diabetes at a very young age. It has resulted in great challenges for researchers elucidating the aetiology of diabetes and related features in other organ systems, for clinicians specifying a diagnosis that leads to improved genetic counselling, predicting of clinical course and changes in treatment, and for patients to altered treatment that has lead to coming off insulin and injections with no alternative (Glucokinase mutations), insulin injections being replaced by tablets (e.g. low dose in HNFalpha or high dose in potassium channel defects -Kir6.2 and SUR1) or with tablets in addition to insulin (e.g. metformin in insulin resistant syndromes). Genetic testing requires guidance to test for what gene especially given limited resources. Monogenic diabetes should be considered in any diabetic patient who has features inconsistent with their current diagnosis (unspecified neonatal diabetes, type 1 or type 2 diabetes) and clinical features of a specific subtype of monogenic diabetes (neonatal diabetes, familial diabetes, mild hyperglycaemia, syndromes). Guidance is given by clinical and physiological features in patient and family and the likelihood of the proposed mutation altering clinical care. In this article, I aimed to provide insight in the genes and mutations involved in insulin synthesis, secretion, and resistance, and to provide guidance for genetic testing by showing the clinical and physiological features and tests for each specified diagnosis as well as the opportunities for treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Slovakia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 107 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 18%
Researcher 15 13%
Student > Postgraduate 14 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 12%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Other 21 18%
Unknown 19 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 22 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2013.
All research outputs
#16,223,992
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
#366
of 505 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,763
of 161,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 505 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,419 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.