↓ Skip to main content

Pipeline for Uncoilable or Failed Aneurysms: Results from a Multicenter Clinical Trial

Overview of attention for article published in Radiology, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
940 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
292 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pipeline for Uncoilable or Failed Aneurysms: Results from a Multicenter Clinical Trial
Published in
Radiology, February 2013
DOI 10.1148/radiol.13120099
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tibor Becske, David F Kallmes, Isil Saatci, Cameron G McDougall, István Szikora, Giuseppe Lanzino, Christopher J Moran, Henry H Woo, Demetrius K Lopes, Aaron L Berez, Daniel J Cher, Adnan H Siddiqui, Elad I Levy, Felipe C Albuquerque, David J Fiorella, Zsolt Berentei, Miklós Marosfoi, Saruhan H Cekirge, Peter K Nelson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 292 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 1%
Japan 3 1%
United States 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 280 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 53 18%
Other 35 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 32 11%
Student > Bachelor 27 9%
Student > Master 25 9%
Other 65 22%
Unknown 55 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 146 50%
Neuroscience 27 9%
Engineering 20 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 1%
Other 10 3%
Unknown 82 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 63. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2024.
All research outputs
#685,247
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Radiology
#505
of 10,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,683
of 313,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiology
#5
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,427 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,848 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.