↓ Skip to main content

Discrimination and racial disparities in health: evidence and needed research

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Behavioral Medicine, November 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#14 of 1,177)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
25 news outlets
blogs
7 blogs
policy
11 policy sources
twitter
31 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
14 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
2457 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1647 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Discrimination and racial disparities in health: evidence and needed research
Published in
Journal of Behavioral Medicine, November 2008
DOI 10.1007/s10865-008-9185-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

David R. Williams, Selina A. Mohammed

Abstract

This paper provides a review and critique of empirical research on perceived discrimination and health. The patterns of racial disparities in health suggest that there are multiple ways by which racism can affect health. Perceived discrimination is one such pathway and the paper reviews the published research on discrimination and health that appeared in PubMed between 2005 and 2007. This recent research continues to document an inverse association between discrimination and health. This pattern is now evident in a wider range of contexts and for a broader array of outcomes. Advancing our understanding of the relationship between perceived discrimination and health will require more attention to situating discrimination within the context of other health-relevant aspects of racism, measuring it comprehensively and accurately, assessing its stressful dimensions, and identifying the mechanisms that link discrimination to health.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,647 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 30 2%
Israel 1 <1%
Bangladesh 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 1613 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 335 20%
Student > Master 209 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 206 13%
Researcher 175 11%
Student > Bachelor 150 9%
Other 262 16%
Unknown 310 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 412 25%
Psychology 357 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 208 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 99 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 2%
Other 152 9%
Unknown 382 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 304. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2024.
All research outputs
#115,230
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Behavioral Medicine
#14
of 1,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#271
of 186,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Behavioral Medicine
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,177 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,851 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them