Title |
Chronset: An automated tool for detecting speech onset
|
---|---|
Published in |
Behavior Research Methods, December 2016
|
DOI | 10.3758/s13428-016-0830-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Frédéric Roux, Blair C. Armstrong, Manuel Carreiras |
Abstract |
The analysis of speech onset times has a longstanding tradition in experimental psychology as a measure of how a stimulus influences a spoken response. Yet the lack of accurate automatic methods to measure such effects forces researchers to rely on time-intensive manual or semiautomatic techniques. Here we present Chronset, a fully automated tool that estimates speech onset on the basis of multiple acoustic features extracted via multitaper spectral analysis. Using statistical optimization techniques, we show that the present approach generalizes across different languages and speaker populations, and that it extracts speech onset latencies that agree closely with those from human observations. Finally, we show how the present approach can be integrated with previous work (Jansen & Watter Behavior Research Methods, 40:744-751, 2008) to further improve the precision of onset detection. Chronset is publicly available online at www.bcbl.eu/databases/chronset . |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 1 | 11% |
Denmark | 1 | 11% |
United States | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 6 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 78% |
Scientists | 1 | 11% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 103 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 29% |
Researcher | 17 | 16% |
Student > Master | 14 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 7% |
Professor | 7 | 6% |
Other | 18 | 17% |
Unknown | 13 | 12% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 35 | 32% |
Linguistics | 22 | 20% |
Neuroscience | 15 | 14% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
Other | 9 | 8% |
Unknown | 22 | 20% |