| Title |
Effects of fluid administration on arterial load in septic shock patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, June 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-015-3898-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Manuel Ignacio Monge García, Pedro Guijo González, Manuel Gracia Romero, Anselmo Gil Cano, Chris Oscier, Andrew Rhodes, Robert Michael Grounds, Maurizio Cecconi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 35% |
| United States | 2 | 9% |
| Italy | 2 | 9% |
| Malaysia | 2 | 9% |
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| Japan | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Denmark | 1 | 4% |
| Argentina | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 3 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 61% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 30% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
| Scientists | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 146 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 21 | 14% |
| Researcher | 20 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 11% |
| Other | 15 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 41 | 28% |
| Unknown | 24 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 96 | 65% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 5% |
| Unknown | 26 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,834,124
of 25,882,826 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#1,521
of 5,519 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,351
of 281,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#4
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,882,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,519 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,854 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.