↓ Skip to main content

Agenesis of the corpus callosum: genetic, developmental and functional aspects of connectivity

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Reviews Neuroscience, April 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
12 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
681 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
779 Mendeley
connotea
4 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Agenesis of the corpus callosum: genetic, developmental and functional aspects of connectivity
Published in
Nature Reviews Neuroscience, April 2007
DOI 10.1038/nrn2107
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lynn K. Paul, Warren S. Brown, Ralph Adolphs, J. Michael Tyszka, Linda J. Richards, Pratik Mukherjee, Elliott H. Sherr

Abstract

Agenesis of the corpus callosum (AgCC), a failure to develop the large bundle of fibres that connect the cerebral hemispheres, occurs in 1:4000 individuals. Genetics, animal models and detailed structural neuroimaging are now providing insights into the developmental and molecular bases of AgCC. Studies using neuropsychological, electroencephalogram and functional MRI approaches are examining the resulting impairments in emotional and social functioning, and have begun to explore the functional neuroanatomy underlying impaired higher-order cognition. The study of AgCC could provide insight into the integrated cerebral functioning of healthy brains, and may offer a model for understanding certain psychiatric illnesses, such as schizophrenia and autism.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 779 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 13 2%
United Kingdom 6 <1%
France 5 <1%
China 4 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Italy 3 <1%
Japan 3 <1%
Israel 2 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Other 10 1%
Unknown 728 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 157 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 116 15%
Student > Bachelor 76 10%
Student > Master 71 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 50 6%
Other 197 25%
Unknown 112 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 177 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 157 20%
Psychology 111 14%
Neuroscience 98 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 3%
Other 61 8%
Unknown 148 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2021.
All research outputs
#2,032,085
of 25,196,456 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Neuroscience
#845
of 2,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,583
of 88,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Neuroscience
#5
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,196,456 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,762 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 88,091 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.