| Title |
Population and forest dynamics during the Central European Eneolithic (4500–2000 BC)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, December 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12520-016-0446-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jan Kolář, Petr Kuneš, Péter Szabó, Mária Hajnalová, Helena Svitavská Svobodová, Martin Macek, Peter Tkáč |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 24% |
| Professor | 4 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Arts and Humanities | 5 | 15% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 9% |
| Mathematics | 2 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 15 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2020.
All research outputs
#12,785,742
of 22,912,409 outputs
Outputs from Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
#447
of 797 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,364
of 419,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
#8
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,912,409 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 797 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 419,294 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.