↓ Skip to main content

Investing in Children: Changes in Parental Spending on Children, 1972–2007

Overview of attention for article published in Demography, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#26 of 2,022)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
34 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
8 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
311 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
261 Mendeley
Title
Investing in Children: Changes in Parental Spending on Children, 1972–2007
Published in
Demography, September 2012
DOI 10.1007/s13524-012-0146-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sabino Kornrich, Frank Furstenberg

Abstract

Parental spending on children is often presumed to be one of the main ways that parents invest in children and a main reason why children from wealthier households are advantaged. Yet, although research has tracked changes in the other main form of parental investment-namely, time-there is little research on spending. We use data from the Consumer Expenditure Survey to examine how spending changed from the early 1970s to the late 2000s, focusing particularly on inequality in parental investment in children. Parental spending increased, as did inequality of investment. We also investigate shifts in the composition of spending and linkages to children's characteristics. Investment in male and female children changed substantially: households with only female children spent significantly less than parents in households with only male children in the early 1970s; but by the 1990s, spending had equalized; and by the late 2000s, girls appeared to enjoy an advantage. Finally, the shape of parental investment over the course of children's lives changed. Prior to the 1990s, parents spent most on children in their teen years. After the 1990s, however, spending was greatest when children were under the age of 6 and in their mid-20s.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 261 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 257 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 61 23%
Student > Master 28 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 27 10%
Researcher 24 9%
Student > Bachelor 15 6%
Other 39 15%
Unknown 67 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 119 46%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 32 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 12 5%
Psychology 10 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 2%
Other 10 4%
Unknown 73 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 315. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2023.
All research outputs
#109,229
of 25,769,258 outputs
Outputs from Demography
#26
of 2,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#463
of 190,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Demography
#1
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,769,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,022 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,326 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.