↓ Skip to main content

Do people with mental illness deserve what they get? Links between meritocratic worldviews and implicit versus explicit stigma

Overview of attention for article published in European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
Title
Do people with mental illness deserve what they get? Links between meritocratic worldviews and implicit versus explicit stigma
Published in
European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, March 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00406-010-0111-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicolas Rüsch, Andrew R. Todd, Galen V. Bodenhausen, Patrick W. Corrigan

Abstract

Meritocratic worldviews that stress personal responsibility, such as the Protestant ethic or general beliefs in a just world, are typically associated with stigmatizing attitudes and could explain the persistence of mental illness stigma. Beliefs in a just world for oneself ("I get what I deserve"), however, are often related to personal well-being and can be a coping resource for stigmatized individuals. Despite these findings in other stigmatized groups, the link between worldviews and the stigma of psychiatric disorders is unknown. We measured just world beliefs for self and others as well as endorsement of the Protestant ethic in 85 people with schizophrenia, schizoaffective or affective disorders and 50 members of the general public. Stigmatizing attitudes toward people with mental illness (perceived responsibility, perceived dangerousness, general agreement with negative stereotypes) were assessed by self-report. Using a response-latency task, the Brief Implicit Association Test, we also examined guilt-related implicit negative stereotypes about mental illness. We found a consistent positive link between endorsing the Protestant ethic and stigmatizing self-reported attitudes in both groups. Implicit guilt-related stereotypes were positively associated with the Protestant ethic only among members of the public. Among people with mental illness, stronger just world beliefs for self were related to reduced self-stigma, but also to more implicit blame of persons with mental illness. The Protestant ethic may increase (self-)stigmatizing attitudes; just world beliefs for oneself, on the other hand, may lead to unexpected implicit self-blame in stigmatized individuals. Public anti-stigma campaigns and initiatives to reduce self-stigma among people with mental illness should take worldviews into account.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
United States 2 1%
North Macedonia 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 144 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 18%
Researcher 24 16%
Student > Master 22 14%
Student > Bachelor 19 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 9%
Other 27 18%
Unknown 18 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 88 58%
Social Sciences 15 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 1%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 23 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2017.
All research outputs
#6,399,392
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
#359
of 1,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,404
of 96,343 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,243 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,343 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.