↓ Skip to main content

There is inadequate evidence to support the division of the genus Borrelia

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
There is inadequate evidence to support the division of the genus Borrelia
Published in
International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, May 2017
DOI 10.1099/ijsem.0.001717
Pubmed ID
Authors

G Margos, D Marosevic, S Cutler, M Derdakova, M Diuk-Wasser, S Emler, D Fish, J Gray, K-P Hunfeldt, B Jaulhac, O Kahl, S Kovalev, P Kraiczy, R S Lane, R Lienhard, P E Lindgren, N Ogden, K Ornstein, T Rupprecht, I Schwartz, A Sing, R K Straubinger, F Strle, M Voordouw, A Rizzoli, B Stevenson, V Fingerle

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 59 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 24%
Professor 7 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 10%
Student > Master 4 7%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 14 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 7%
Unspecified 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 16 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2019.
All research outputs
#3,614,362
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology
#1,667
of 10,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,636
of 324,896 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology
#10
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,706 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,896 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.