You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Differences Among International Pharyngitis Guidelines: Not Just Academic
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Family Medicine, September 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1370/afm.741 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jan Matthys, Marc De Meyere, Mieke L. van Driel, An De Sutter |
| Abstract |
Many countries have national guidelines for the treatment of pharyngitis. We wanted to compare the recommendations and the reported evidence in national guidelines for the management of acute sore throat in adults. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 29% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 14% |
| Finland | 1 | 7% |
| Japan | 1 | 7% |
| Austria | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 79% |
| Scientists | 2 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 119 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 18 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 12% |
| Researcher | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 9% |
| Other | 37 | 30% |
| Unknown | 19 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 65 | 52% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 11% |
| Unknown | 24 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 152. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2023.
All research outputs
#274,586
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Family Medicine
#105
of 1,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#361
of 81,778 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Family Medicine
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,778 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them