Title |
Predation of arctic fox (Vulpes lagopus) pups by common ravens (Corvus corax)
|
---|---|
Published in |
Polar Biology, November 2015
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00300-015-1843-4 |
Authors |
Clément Chevallier, Sandra Lai, Dominique Berteaux |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 21% |
Student > Master | 5 | 18% |
Researcher | 4 | 14% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 7% |
Other | 6 | 21% |
Unknown | 3 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 46% |
Environmental Science | 9 | 32% |
Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 3 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2020.
All research outputs
#7,495,032
of 22,912,409 outputs
Outputs from Polar Biology
#600
of 1,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,284
of 387,730 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Polar Biology
#22
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,912,409 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,653 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 387,730 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.