| Title |
Aligning simulation models: A case study and results
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, February 1996
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf01299065 |
| Authors |
Robert Axtell, Robert Axelrod, Joshua M. Epstein, Michael D. Cohen |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 304 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 19 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 10 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 3 | <1% |
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 9 | 3% |
| Unknown | 252 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 105 | 35% |
| Researcher | 46 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 36 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 30 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 6% |
| Other | 58 | 19% |
| Unknown | 11 | 4% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 59 | 19% |
| Computer Science | 51 | 17% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 33 | 11% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 28 | 9% |
| Engineering | 27 | 9% |
| Other | 73 | 24% |
| Unknown | 33 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2015.
All research outputs
#1,818,140
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory
#4
of 96 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,452
of 81,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 96 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,654 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them