↓ Skip to main content

Cellulosomes: bacterial nanomachines for dismantling plant polysaccharides

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Reviews Microbiology, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
323 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
476 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cellulosomes: bacterial nanomachines for dismantling plant polysaccharides
Published in
Nature Reviews Microbiology, December 2016
DOI 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.164
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lior Artzi, Edward A. Bayer, Sarah Moraïs

Abstract

Cellulosomes are multienzyme complexes that are produced by anaerobic cellulolytic bacteria for the degradation of lignocellulosic biomass. They comprise a complex of scaffoldin, which is the structural subunit, and various enzymatic subunits. The intersubunit interactions in these multienzyme complexes are mediated by cohesin and dockerin modules. Cellulosome-producing bacteria have been isolated from a large variety of environments, which reflects their prevalence and the importance of this microbial enzymatic strategy. In a given species, cellulosomes exhibit intrinsic heterogeneity, and between species there is a broad diversity in the composition and configuration of cellulosomes. With the development of modern technologies, such as genomics and proteomics, the full protein content of cellulosomes and their expression levels can now be assessed and the regulatory mechanisms identified. Owing to their highly efficient organization and hydrolytic activity, cellulosomes hold immense potential for application in the degradation of biomass and are the focus of much effort to engineer an ideal microorganism for the conversion of lignocellulose to valuable products, such as biofuels.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 476 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Unknown 473 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 104 22%
Researcher 75 16%
Student > Master 67 14%
Student > Bachelor 59 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 4%
Other 53 11%
Unknown 98 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 141 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 114 24%
Immunology and Microbiology 19 4%
Chemical Engineering 18 4%
Engineering 17 4%
Other 57 12%
Unknown 110 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2018.
All research outputs
#4,866,332
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Microbiology
#1,572
of 2,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,878
of 422,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Microbiology
#32
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,733 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,427 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.