↓ Skip to main content

Endogenous money and the business cycle

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Economics, June 1997
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#12 of 166)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Endogenous money and the business cycle
Published in
Journal of Economics, June 1997
DOI 10.1007/bf01226931
Authors

Thomas I. Palley

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 21%
Lecturer 3 13%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Other 6 25%
Unknown 4 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 13 54%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 13%
Social Sciences 2 8%
Psychology 1 4%
Unknown 5 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2014.
All research outputs
#4,178,923
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Economics
#12
of 166 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,606
of 29,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Economics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 166 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 29,197 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them