| Title |
Possible design-induced artifacts associated with designs for discrete choice experiments
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Statistical Theory and Practice, June 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1080/15598608.2016.1258680 |
| Authors |
Tiago Ribeiro, Richard Carson, Jordan J. Louviere, John M. Rose |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 11 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 17% |
| Professor | 2 | 17% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 2 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 3 | 25% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 17% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 17% |
| Engineering | 2 | 17% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 2 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2017.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Statistical Theory and Practice
#43
of 59 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#289,163
of 330,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Statistical Theory and Practice
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 59 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,492 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them