↓ Skip to main content

Characterisation of Ramularia collo‐cygni laboratory mutants resistant to succinate dehydrogenase inhibitors

Overview of attention for article published in Pesticide Science, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Characterisation of Ramularia collo‐cygni laboratory mutants resistant to succinate dehydrogenase inhibitors
Published in
Pesticide Science, November 2016
DOI 10.1002/ps.4442
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marta J Piotrowska, James M Fountaine, Richard A Ennos, Maciej Kaczmarek, Fiona J Burnett

Abstract

Ramularia collo-cygni (Rcc) is responsible for Ramularia leaf spot (RLS), a foliar disease of barley contributing to serious economic losses. Protection against the disease has been almost exclusively based on fungicide applications, including Succinate Dehydrogenase Inhibitors (SDHIs). In 2015 the first field isolates of Rcc with reduced sensitivity to SDHIs were recorded in some European countries. In this study we established baseline sensitivity of Rcc to SDHIs in the UK and characterised mutations correlating with resistance to SDHIs in UV-generated mutants. Five SDHI resistant isolates were generated by UV mutagenesis. In four of these mutants a single amino acid change in a target succinate dehydrogenase (Sdh) protein was associated with decrease in sensitivity to SDHIs. Three of these mutations were stably inherited in the absence of SDHI fungicide and resistant isolates did not demonstrate a fitness penalty. There were no detectable declines in sensitivity in field populations in years 2010-2012 in the UK. SDHIs remained effective in controlling Rcc in the UK in years 2010-2012. However given that the first isolates of Rcc with reduced sensitivity appeared in other European countries in 2015, robust anti-resistance strategies need to be continuously implemented to maintain effective disease control.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 32%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Master 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 8 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 8%
Chemistry 2 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 9 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2020.
All research outputs
#8,262,107
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Pesticide Science
#1,027
of 3,674 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,571
of 288,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pesticide Science
#11
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,674 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,245 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.