↓ Skip to main content

Hummingbird with modern feathering: an exceptionally well-preserved Oligocene fossil from southern France

Overview of attention for article published in The Science of Nature, September 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
Title
Hummingbird with modern feathering: an exceptionally well-preserved Oligocene fossil from southern France
Published in
The Science of Nature, September 2007
DOI 10.1007/s00114-007-0309-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antoine Louchart, Nicolas Tourment, Julie Carrier, Thierry Roux, Cécile Mourer-Chauviré

Abstract

Hummingbirds (Trochilidae) today have an exclusively New World distribution, but their pre-Pleistocene fossil record comes from Europe only. In this study, we describe an exceptionally preserved fossil hummingbird from the early Oligocene of southeastern France. The specimen is articulated, with a completely preserved beak and feathering. Osteological characters allow to identify it as Eurotrochilus sp. This genus is a stem group representative of Trochilidae and was recently described from the early Oligocene of southern Germany. The new fossil reveals that these European Trochilidae were remarkably modern in size, skeletal proportions and the shape of the wing, tail and beak and hyoid bones. These features confirm the early acquisition of the abilities of hovering and nectarivory in hummingbirds, probably before the Oligocene. In several morphological characteristics, they resemble members of the 'true hummingbirds' (subfamily Trochilinae) and differ from hermits (Phaethornithinae). These features, which include a short and square tail and a moderately long, almost straight beak, appear to be primitive within the family Trochilidae.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 3 4%
Germany 2 3%
Brazil 2 3%
France 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
New Zealand 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 62 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 18%
Student > Master 10 14%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 7 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 42 58%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 16 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Environmental Science 2 3%
Linguistics 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,716,437
of 25,602,335 outputs
Outputs from The Science of Nature
#232
of 2,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,467
of 84,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Science of Nature
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,602,335 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,273 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 84,497 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.