↓ Skip to main content

Tracking the train of thought from the laboratory into everyday life: An experience-sampling study of mind wandering across controlled and ecological contexts

Overview of attention for article published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
261 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
321 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Tracking the train of thought from the laboratory into everyday life: An experience-sampling study of mind wandering across controlled and ecological contexts
Published in
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, October 2009
DOI 10.3758/pbr.16.5.857
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer C. McVay, Michael J. Kane, Thomas R. Kwapil

Abstract

In an experience-sampling study that bridged laboratory, ecological, and individual-differences approaches to mind-wandering research, 72 subjects completed an executive-control task with periodic thought probes (reported by McVay & Kane, 2009) and then carried PDAs for a week that signaled them eight times daily to report immediately whether their thoughts were off task. Subjects who reported more mind wandering during the laboratory task endorsed more mind-wandering experiences during everyday life (and were more likely to report worries as off-task thought content). We also conceptually replicated laboratory findings that mind wandering predicts task performance: Subjects rated their daily-life performance to be impaired when they reported off-task thoughts, with greatest impairment when subjects' mind wandering lacked metaconsciousness. The propensity to mind wander appears to be a stable cognitive characteristic and seems to predict performance difficulties in daily life, just as it does in the laboratory.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 321 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 2%
Italy 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 305 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 86 27%
Student > Master 42 13%
Researcher 41 13%
Student > Bachelor 33 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 7%
Other 59 18%
Unknown 39 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 188 59%
Neuroscience 22 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 12 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 3%
Computer Science 9 3%
Other 33 10%
Unknown 47 15%