↓ Skip to main content

On freedom and planning in science: The Society for Freedom in Science, 1940–46

Overview of attention for article published in Minerva, March 1978
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
On freedom and planning in science: The Society for Freedom in Science, 1940–46
Published in
Minerva, March 1978
DOI 10.1007/bf01102181
Authors

William McGucken

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 7%
Unknown 13 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 14%
Researcher 2 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 4 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 4 29%
Social Sciences 2 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 7%
Physics and Astronomy 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 4 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2020.
All research outputs
#4,366,536
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Minerva
#103
of 424 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#433
of 5,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Minerva
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 424 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 5,474 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them