↓ Skip to main content

Large-scale mutagenesis directed at specific chromosomes in wheat.

Overview of attention for article published in Genome, January 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Article details
Title
Large-scale mutagenesis directed at specific chromosomes in wheat.
Published in
Genome, January 2001
DOI 10.1139/gen-44-1-45
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

A novel approach has been developed to allow for the efficient selection of loss-of-function wheat mutants in the M1 generation, following either physical or chemical mutagenesis. This has generated an order of magnitude increase in the efficiency of identification of mutants, and also greatly increases the likelihood that selected individuals reflect mutation events at the target locus, rather than at genes acting elsewhere in the disease resistance pathway. The approach relies only on prior knowledge of the chromosomal location of the target gene, and uses the polyploidy of wheat to construct populations for mutagenesis in which large numbers of individuals are hemizygous for the target gene. The idea is illustrated with the mass identification of mutants at three independent genes for race-specific resistance to yellow rust, and one gene for resistance to powdery mildew.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history

Loading chart data

Monthly Attention Score data from August 2022 to July 2025. Daily data from 25 July 2025.

An error occurred while generating this chart. Please try again later.

No score history available for this output yet. Please try again later.

Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 40%
Professor 3 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Unknown 1 10%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 70%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 10%
Unknown 1 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2016.
All research outputs
#5,737,721
of 33,251,071 outputs
Outputs from Genome
#161
of 1,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,215
of 156,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome
#3
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,251,071 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,533 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,709 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.