You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Monitoring and Understanding Changes in Heat Waves, Cold Waves, Floods, and Droughts in the United States: State of Knowledge
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1175/bams-d-12-00066.1 |
| Authors |
Thomas C. Peterson, Richard R. Heim, Robert Hirsch, Dale P. Kaiser, Harold Brooks, Noah S. Diffenbaugh, Randall M. Dole, Jason P. Giovannettone, Kristen Guirguis, Thomas R. Karl, Richard W. Katz, Kenneth Kunkel, Dennis Lettenmaier, Gregory J. McCabe, Christopher J. Paciorek, Karen R. Ryberg, Siegfried Schubert, Viviane B. S. Silva, Brooke C. Stewart, Aldo V. Vecchia, Gabriele Villarini, Russell S. Vose, John Walsh, Michael Wehner, David Wolock, Klaus Wolter, Connie A. Woodhouse, Donald Wuebbles |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 33% |
| Canada | 2 | 6% |
| South Africa | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 17 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 26 | 79% |
| Scientists | 3 | 9% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 492 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | <1% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 479 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 106 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 104 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 50 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 5% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 26 | 5% |
| Other | 80 | 16% |
| Unknown | 99 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 132 | 27% |
| Environmental Science | 92 | 19% |
| Engineering | 52 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 32 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 20 | 4% |
| Other | 44 | 9% |
| Unknown | 120 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 274. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2022.
All research outputs
#131,485
of 25,547,904 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
#47
of 3,311 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#811
of 206,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
#1
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,547,904 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,311 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,850 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.