↓ Skip to main content

Enabling self-service BI: A methodology and a case study for a model management warehouse

Overview of attention for article published in Information Systems Frontiers, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
Title
Enabling self-service BI: A methodology and a case study for a model management warehouse
Published in
Information Systems Frontiers, November 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10796-016-9722-2
Authors

David Schuff, Karen Corral, Robert D. St. Louis, Greg Schymik

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 76 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 14%
Student > Bachelor 10 13%
Unspecified 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 3%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 22 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 22 29%
Business, Management and Accounting 9 12%
Unspecified 5 7%
Engineering 5 7%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 25 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2016.
All research outputs
#5,770,228
of 22,912,409 outputs
Outputs from Information Systems Frontiers
#62
of 311 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,963
of 415,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Information Systems Frontiers
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,912,409 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 311 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 415,149 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them