| Title |
Destabilization of covert networks
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, April 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10588-006-7083-y |
| Authors |
Kathleen M. Carley |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 71 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 12% |
| Researcher | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 19 | 26% |
| Unknown | 7 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 27 | 37% |
| Computer Science | 13 | 18% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 7 | 10% |
| Mathematics | 4 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 12% |
| Unknown | 9 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2007.
All research outputs
#7,917,073
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory
#30
of 96 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,295
of 68,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 96 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 68,220 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.