| Title |
The Current Status of Engineering Myocardial Tissue
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Stem Cell Reviews and Reports, March 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12015-010-9131-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Runqian Sui, Xiaobo Liao, Xinmin Zhou, Qi Tan |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 6% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 42 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 29% |
| Researcher | 7 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 19% |
| Unknown | 6 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 11 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 13% |
| Materials Science | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 8 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2015.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Stem Cell Reviews and Reports
#400
of 1,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,325
of 102,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stem Cell Reviews and Reports
#10
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,035 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,242 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.