| Title |
The iPad as a mobile device for CT display and interpretation: diagnostic accuracy for identification of pulmonary embolism
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Emergency Radiology, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10140-012-1037-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pamela T. Johnson, Stefan L. Zimmerman, David Heath, John Eng, Karen M. Horton, William W. Scott, Elliot K. Fishman |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 65 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 15 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 13% |
| Researcher | 8 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 15 | 21% |
| Unknown | 9 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 46% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 16 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2018.
All research outputs
#4,726,418
of 22,919,505 outputs
Outputs from Emergency Radiology
#93
of 520 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,577
of 160,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Emergency Radiology
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,919,505 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 520 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,594 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.