↓ Skip to main content

Clinical Implications of an Accurate Problem List on Heart Failure Treatment

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of General Internal Medicine, February 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
Clinical Implications of an Accurate Problem List on Heart Failure Treatment
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine, February 2005
DOI 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.40206.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel M. Hartung, Jacquelyn Hunt, Joseph Siemienczuk, Heather Miller, Daniel R. Touchette

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 4%
Argentina 1 2%
Unknown 44 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 15%
Student > Master 6 13%
Other 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 8 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 49%
Computer Science 5 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Engineering 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 10 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2015.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#4,426
of 8,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,945
of 157,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#21
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,173 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,721 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.