↓ Skip to main content

The gastric bypass operation reduces the progression and mortality of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, May 1997
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
patent
4 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
426 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
connotea
2 Connotea
Title
The gastric bypass operation reduces the progression and mortality of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus
Published in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, May 1997
DOI 10.1016/s1091-255x(97)80112-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kenneth G. MacDonald, Stuart D. Long, Melvin S. Swanson, Brenda M. Brown, Patricia Morris, G. Lynis Dohm, Walter J. Pories

Abstract

Of 232 morbidly obese patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus referred to East Carolina University between March 5, 1979, and January 1, 1994, 154 had a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass operation and 78 did not undergo surgery because of personal preference or their insurance company"s refusal to pay for the procedure. The surgical and the nonoperative (control) groups were comparable in terms of age, weight, body mass index, sex, and percentage with hypertension. The two groups were compared retrospectively to determine differences in survival and the need for medical management of their diabetes. Mean length of follow-up was 9 years in the surgical group and 6.2 years in the control group. The mean glucose levels in the surgical group fell from 187 mg/dl preoperatively and remained less than 140 mg/dl for up to 10 years of follow-up. The percentage of control subjects being treated with oral hypoglycemics or insulin increased from 56.4% at initial contact to 87.5% at last contact (P = 0.0003), whereas the percentage of surgical patients requiring medical management fell from 31.8% preoperatively to 8.6% at last contact (P = 0.0001). The mortality rate in the control group was 28% compared to 9% in the surgical group (including perioperative deaths). For every year of follow-up, patients in the control group had a 4.5% chance of dying vs. a 1.0% chance for those in the surgical group. The improvement in the mortality rate in the surgical group was primarily due to a decrease in the number of cardiovascular deaths.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 1%
Unknown 82 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 18%
Student > Master 11 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Other 7 8%
Other 21 25%
Unknown 14 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 57%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 8%
Engineering 2 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Linguistics 1 1%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 20 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2020.
All research outputs
#3,802,325
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
#214
of 2,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,185
of 29,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,489 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 29,378 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them