| Title |
Lead exposure in italy: 800 BC-700 AD
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Anthropology, April 1992
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02444992 |
| Authors |
A. C. Aufderheide, G. Rapp, L. E. Wittmers, J. E. Wallgren, R. Macchiarelli, G. Fornaciari, F. Mallegni, R. S. Corruccini |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 9 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 3 | 30% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 20% |
| Other | 1 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 3 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | 40% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 10% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2012.
All research outputs
#2,109,029
of 22,710,079 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Anthropology
#3
of 26 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#495
of 19,200 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Anthropology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,710,079 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 26 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one scored the same or higher as 23 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 19,200 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them