↓ Skip to main content

Bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in hospitals with and without surgical residency programs: is there a difference?

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Endoscopy, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
Title
Bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in hospitals with and without surgical residency programs: is there a difference?
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy, December 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00464-010-1495-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vincent L. Harrison, James P. Dolan, Thai H. Pham, Brian S. Diggs, Alexander J. Greenstein, Brett C. Sheppard, John G. Hunter

Abstract

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is a common surgical procedure performed by surgical residents under the supervision of attending surgeons. There is a perception that performance of LC in a facility with a surgical training program provides a safer environment due to the presence of an assistant surgeon. The aim of this study was to compare the rate of bile duct injury, conversion, and mortality between hospitals with surgical residency programs (Group I) and hospitals without surgical training programs (Group II).

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 11%
Other 4 11%
Librarian 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Other 12 34%
Unknown 6 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 49%
Unspecified 2 6%
Engineering 2 6%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 9 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2011.
All research outputs
#5,653,139
of 22,710,079 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#1,010
of 6,006 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,041
of 180,325 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#1
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,710,079 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,006 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,325 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.