↓ Skip to main content

Moose-wolf dynamics and the natural regulation of moose populations

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, March 1985
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
139 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
Title
Moose-wolf dynamics and the natural regulation of moose populations
Published in
Oecologia, March 1985
DOI 10.1007/bf00379664
Pubmed ID
Authors

François Messier, Michel Crête

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 121 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 24 19%
Student > Master 24 19%
Researcher 24 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 15%
Other 11 9%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 14 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 79 64%
Environmental Science 26 21%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 <1%
Social Sciences 1 <1%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 16 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 1997.
All research outputs
#7,495,032
of 22,912,409 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#1,680
of 4,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,689
of 9,683 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,912,409 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,225 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 9,683 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.